Please wait while we gather the requested information from the database...



Get Involved
| Contact Us | Join | Site Map | Help
Submit Button for the Search Form
 
Login: E-mail address
Password
Submit Button for the Login Form
Forgot your Password?

Visit the SOT 2011 Annual Meeting Web site — Mark your calendar SOT March 6–10, 2011.

View the Celebration Events on the 50th Anniversary Web site.

Special Hosting Opportunities for the SOT 50th Anniversary Annual Meeting.

Fifth Triennial Toxicology Salary Survey

Shayne C. Gad
Gad Consulting Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A.

The 2001 Triennial Toxicology Salary Survey was conducted as a joint project by the American College of Toxicology and the Society of Toxicology. In addition to the two parent organizations, 20 others (the Teratology Society, the Association of Government Toxicologists, and 17* regional chapters of the Society of Toxicology) supported the effort by providing mailing labels for their membership.
A total of 5,826 survey instruments were distributed in June/July, with 114 of these eventually being returned as undeliverable, making the effective mailing 5,712. As of December 31, 2,459 responses had been received, for a response rate of 43%. This is comparable to the response rates for 1988 (Gad, 1989), 1991 (Gad, 1992) 1995 (Gad, 1996) and 1998(Gad, 1999). The survey instrument was a modification of that used in the previous four surveys, with the major change being an expansion of response categories for the upper end of the salary and bonus ranges. It should be noted that there continues to be a significant increase in the number of individuals reporting six-figure incomes and in those receiving significant sums as bonuses, as is reflected particularly in Tables 1 and 4. Survey methodology employed conformed to standard procedures (Rossi et al, 1983), though the response rate for this survey remains high for such endeavors.

A total of 1,711 of the respondents (1,229 men and 484 women) were full-time employed holders of doctoral degrees in the U.S. and Canada out of a total adjusted mailing of 3,312 for this doctoral degree group (for a 51.5% response rate). Table 1 presents the mean salaries (± one standard deviation) for these individuals, sorted by years of experience after receipt of their degrees, sex, and field of employment. Salaries are in thousands of U.S. dollars per year.

The mean salaries (± 1 SD) for the 154 master's-level respondents are presented in Table 2. Likewise, the results from the 180 bachelor's-level respondents are presented in Table 3. The remaining respondents were not employed full-time during the reporting period and are characterized as follows:

Only three associates level responses were received, all from contract laboratory employment

*Two regionals used email1 to distribute surveys and for member responses. As expected (based on feedback in the 1998 survey), response rates for these were lower than for other regionals.

Table 1. 2001 Doctoral-Level Salaries

     

Years experience post-terminal degree

Employer

Sex

Number of respondents

0-1

1-3

3-5

5-10

10-20

20+

Consumer product

M

F

50

23

-

-

75

-

85

85

83 (75-95)

88.3 (75-105)

118.6 (95-150)

90 (59-105)

155.1 (100-200)

126 (115-140)

Pharmaceutical industry

M

F

287

98

-

-

75 (65-85)

75 (65-85)

82.5 (75-95)

78.3 (75-85)

98.9 (85-109)

101.6 (85-120)

120.5 (106-140)

114.4 (89-135)

150.3 (117-180)

123.3 (87-150)

Consultants

M

F

65

30

-

45

65

65

95

72.5 (65-77)

89 (75-105)

87.5 (65-105)

96 (85-115)

102.9 (78-133)

117 (65-148)

111.7 (105-115)

Consultants (self-employed)*

M

F

66

26

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

133

193 (115-300)

154 (65-350)

178 (20-500+)

217.5 (20-400+)

Chemical industry

M

F

111

50

65

65

65

75 (65-85)

80 (75-85)

85

91.7 (77-124)

82.2 (67-94)

103.5 (84-121)

99.3 (86-114)

120.8 (108-145)

107 (95-115)

Contract research

M

F

133

47

45 (35-55)

55 (35-60)

50 (35-75)

57 (37-73)

81 (65-105)

-

83.6 (76-115)

76.7 (55-95)

96.9 (78-120)

88.6 (75-97)

125.7 (95-150)

115.7 (90-119)

Academic

M

F

268

106

35

45

37.5 (27-39)

41.6 (35-55)

38.5 (35-45)

49 (45-55)

66 (37-87)

55.7 (37-73)

83.7 (66-107)

75.8 (56-107)

111.7 (88-140)

82.9 (38-119)

State/local government

M

F

58

17

-

-

-

45

70

20

65 (55-85)

65 (55-75)

77.2 (67-89)

72.5 (55-85)

84.2 (74-98)

78.3 (65-87)

Federal government

M

F

136

61

-

-

55

37.5 (35-45)

60 (55-65)

65 (55-75)

68.3 (57-76)

63.3 (55-75)

79.5 (74-97)

80.6 (67-98)

95.9 (86-114)

102.6 (87-117)

Petrochemical

M

F

14

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

108 (95-126)

115 (95-135)

115 (90-135)

-

Others

M

F

39

14

-

-

55

75

60 (55-65)

55 (45-70)

88 (65-105)

70 (55-85)

128 (95-155)

101.7 (75-115)

131 (105-170)

135 9115-160)

 

 

Note: Salaries are in thousands of U.S. dollars: mean (range for ± 1 SD). In 24/49 cases, male salaries were higher than females-even split..
* Two subpopulations are apparent here (above and below $100K). Ranges are presented for these instead of SD.

 

Table 2. 2001 Master’s-level salaries

     

Years experience post-terminal degree

Employer

Sex

Number of

respondents

0-1

1-3

3-5

5-10

10-20

20+

Consumer product

M

F

6

9

-

45

-

65

-

65

70 (65-75)

60 (55-65)

-

75

101.7 (95-105)

85

Pharmaceutical industry

M

F

29

22

-

20

-

55

50 (45-55)

-

60 (55-65)

75 (65-85)

77.1 (75-105)

92.5 (77-105)

75 (65-85)

95 (65-125)

Consultants

M

F

18

26

-

-

35

-

65 (55-75)

45

-

65 (45-75)

98.7 (67-115)

87 (67-115)

98.8 (75-140)

50 (35-65)

Chemical industry

M

F

19

7

-

-

65

-

60 (55-65)

65

-

65

108 (95-115)

85 (55-115)

107.5 (85-130)

95

Contract research

M

F

7

16

-

-

-

45

-

55

-

54 (54-65)

106.6 (75-122)

65 (45-75)

60 (45-75)

115

Academic

M

F

1

9

20

20

-

25

-

25

-

28 (15-35)

-

-

-

-

State/local government

M

F

1

9

-

-

-

35

-

-

45

35

-

60.2 (55-65)

-

75 (65-85)

Federal government

M

F

12

12

-

-

50 (45-55)

45

-

50 (45-55)

55

45

65 (55-75)

79.9 (69-95)

75 (65-85)

75

Others

M

F

6

10

-

25

-

-

65

60 (55-65)

35 (25-45)

65

65

75 (55-95)

117 (75-160)

105

 

Note: Salaries are in thousands of U.S. dollars: mean (range for ± 1 SD).

 

 

Table 3. 2001 Bachelor’s-level salaries 

     

Years experience post-terminal degree

Employer

Sex

Number of

Respondents

0-1

1-3

3-5

5-10

10-20

20+

Consumer product

M

F

2

4

40

25

-

-

-

45

-

-

-

70 (65-75)

-

-

Pharmaceutical industry

M

F

23

49

-

35

-

47 (45-55)

45 (35-55)

50 (45-55)

55(45-65)

57.5 (45-65)

70 (65-75)

65 (45-75)

83.3 (65-95)

82.5 (65-105)

Consultants

M

F

1

7

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

45

-

70 (65-75)

130

110 (95-135)

Chemical industry

M

F

7

11

-

35

-

-

-

-

60 (55-65)

-

-

65 (55-75)

87 (75-105)

80 (55-95)

Contract research

M

F

31

16

35 (25-45)

-

30 (25-35)

35

-

-

35

45 (35-55)

57.8 (45-65)

50 (25-75)

68 (55-85)

68.3 (65-75)

Academic

M

F

4

11

22.5 (20-30)

20 (15-25)

25

20

-

-

-

28.3 (15-35)

-

-

-

-

State/local government

M

F

-

4

-

25

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Federal government

M

F

4

-

-

-

25

-

-

-

35

-

-

-

95

-

Others

M

F

7

-

40 (35-45)

-

25

-

45 (35-55)

-

-

-

-

-

90 (85-95)

-

Note: Salaries are in thousands of U.S. dollars: mean (range for ± 1 SD).

 

Table 4. 2001 Doctoral-level bonuses 

     

Years experience post-terminal degree

Employer

Sex

Number of

recipients a

0-1

1-3

3-5

5-10

10-20

20+

Consumer product

M

F

42 — 84%

16 — 70%

-

-

-

-

2

2

9.5 (2.9-20)

8 (5-11)

39.2 (2.5-155)

17 (4-25)

73.6 (2.5-150)

34 (12-50)

Pharmaceutical industry

M

F

278 — 96%

96 — 98%

-

-

3.8 (.8-10)

5.2 (1.5-9)

9 (1-15)

5.3 (1-15)

10.8 (2.5-30)

14.9 (3.5-64)

28 (1.5-150)

15.5 (1-70)

38.4 (6-147)

15.7 (4-36.5)

Consultants (employees)

M

F

36 — 55%

22 — 73%

-

-

-

-

10

2.7 (1.5-3)

15.7 (.5-40)

7 (2-14)

8.9 (.6-30)

5.2 (1-10)

34.2 (9-90)

10

Chemical industry

M

F

68 — 61%

36 — 72%

5

-

2

4.5

6.5 (4-9)

2.7 (1.9-4)

9.7 (2-18.7)

9.5 (4-15)

14 (.8-33)

8.2 (1.8-16)

27.9 (2-300)

10 (3-20)

Contract research

M

F

68 — 51%

17 — 36%

-

-

-

4

1.6 (.7-2.5)

5

7.8 (4.5-10)

3.3 (1.5-5)

10.8 (2.5-25)

5.3 (2-9)

31.7 (1.7-150)

16 (2-30)

Academic

M

F

19 — 7%

2 — 2%

-

-

.1

-

.2

-

-

-

4.6 (.6-8)

-

10.3 (.5-30)

9 (8-10)

State/local government

M

F

3 — 5%

1 — 6%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2 (1-3)

-

1

10

Federal government 

M

F

25 — 18%

8 — 13%

-

-

1.5

-

-

-

2.0

0.8 (.5-1.1)

1.9 (.6-3.6)

7.5 (6-9)

4.5 (.4-25)

1.9 (1-3)

Others

M

F

25 — 64%

8 — 57%

 

-

-

 

-

-

 

-

-

 

2.6

-

 

33.4 (3-100)

25.2 (2.5-43)

 

38.7 (10-125)

11.2 (3.5-20)

Note: Bonuses are in thousands of U.S. dollars: mean (range for ± 1 SD).
a Receiving bonuses/total (%).

 

Table 5. Geographic distribution of employed doctoral respondents 

State

Number of respondents

State

Number of respondents

Alabama

5

New Hampshire

2

Alaska

-

New Jersey

138

Arkansas

13

New Mexico

11

Arizona

9

Nevada

6

California

149

New York

75

Colorado

24

North Carolina

173

Connecticut

36

North Dakota

5

District of Columbia

43

Ohio

101

Delaware

27

Oklahoma

8

Florida

28

Oregon

11

Georgia

16

Pennsylvania

82

Idaho

1

Puerto Rico

1

Illinois

88

Rhode Island

-

Indiana

36

South Carolina

2

Iowa

6

South Dakota

1

Kansas

16

Tennessee

17

Kentucky

16

Texas

61

Louisiana

13

Utah

5

Maine

8

Virginia

46

Maryland

105

Washington

33

Massachusetts

35

Wisconsin

24

Michigan

91

West Virginia

9

Minnesota

30

Wyoming

1

Missouri

7

Canada

33

Mississippi

5

Not reported

54

Nebraska

5

   

 

Table 6. Society affiliations of doctoral respondents

Professional society

Number of national members responding

Society of Toxicology

1353

American College of Toxicology

463

Teratology Society

205

Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

96

Environmental Mutagen Society

88

American Chemical Society
78
SRA, ASSX, AACR, STP, ACVP, AVMA, ASPET, AAAS, DABT,
AACC, SFN, ACGIS, SFT, SSR, ASM, AIHA, APS, ABT, SNS, Sigma Xi, NBTS, APHA, BTS, AAASOT, AAARTA, AAI, DIA, AGT, NCSOT, Eurotox, AALAS, RAPS, ASCB, FASEB, ABVT, ASBMB, AAVCT, ISRTP, ACGH, AAA, ES, AFS, IST,
SOTC, ASTM, SON, ASN, ACLAM, SOTP, SOFT, ESA, ASP, RSA, ASCP, SQA, EB, MTA, BPS, ASSE, IFT, AAIH, NYAS, SIVB, GEMS, AACT, GTA, ISPT, AHA, ABIH, AMA, SPB, AACP, SID, MISOT, SPS, AIN, NTS, ASVCP
fewer than 75 employees

 

Table 7. Recipients of doctoral degrees (and survey
respondents) in toxicology by year

Year

Graduates

Survey years post-degree/respondents

1981  

20 + / 733

1982  
10-20/ 586

1983

60

 
1984

97

 
1985

98

 
1986

104

 
1987

115

 
1988

111

 
1989

91

1990

86

 
1991

104

 
1992

99

5-10/254

1993

94

 
1994

87

1995

84

1996

86

 
1997

82

3-5/ 80

1998
80
 
1999
80
1-3/ 64

2000
78
 
2001

73

0-1/ 25

 

Table 8. Geographic comparison: doctoral-level salaries

     

Years experience post-terminal degree

State

Sex

Number of respondents

0-1

1-3

3-5

5-10

10-20

20 +

California

M

98

- 75

75

106 (85-122) 110 (85-150) 122.3 (87-170)
 

F

51

- 45 (35-55)

85 (75-125)

101.2 75-125) 106 (95-120) 117.5 (85-180)
Illinois

M

63

55 70 (55-85)

90 (75-125)

91 (75-105) 118 (85-150) -
 

F

25

- -

75

75 95 (75-150) 106 (85-200)
Maryland

M

69

- 60 (55-65)

50 (35-65)

85 88.3 (75-105) 106.4 (85-127)
 

F

36

- 58 (45-65)

65

57 (45-65) 93.6 (65-135) 123 (85-200)
Michigan

M

66

45 -

85

85 (75-105) 110 (55-138) 128.4 (107-155)
 

F

25

- -

80 (75-85)

110 (90-130) 97.6 (75-148) 65 (55-75)
North Carolina

M

109

- 47 (35-65)

85

81.4 (65-85) 103.7 (77-135) 120 (75-125)
 

F

64

35 55 (45-75)

65 (55-85)

73.8 (55-85) 87 (65-95) 99.4 (105-118)
New Jersey

M

96

- -

105

83 (65-95) 115 (95-145) 139.7 (105-145)
 

F

42

35 -

80 (65-85)

85 (67-105) 107 (95-125) 107 (95-115)
Ohio

M

69

- 70 (65-75)

-

87.8 (75-95) 105 (77-125) 123.5 (85-145)
 

F

32

- 75

85

75 (55-95) 89 (75-105) 105.5 (65-137)

 

Note: Salaries are in thousands of U.S. dollars: mean (range for ± 1 SD).

 

Table 9. Certification and doctoral salaries

Years of experience

Overall

With certification

Without certification

 
M
F
M
F

0-1

0/1

-

45
56.4
46.2

1-3

5/6
67.8
72.5
67.8
68.4

3-5

14/5
74.5
68.3
69
64.2

5-10

86/56
93.9
126
85.8
82.4

10-20

241/85
122.5
98.3
102.8
92

20+

379/50
125.4
113
122.4
96.3

Respondents

 
716
223
514
254

 

Table 10. Self-employed consultants: years so employed

 

Respondents

Years self-employed

Males

Females

1

6

1

2

3

3

3

3

-

4

1

3

5

6

2

5-10

11

3

10-15

7

1

15+

7

-

 

Working part-time 118
Unemployed 38
Retired 147
Postdoctoral 74

There were also 3 associate degree respondents.

Table 4 presents a summary of data on those 655 (41% of all employed) doctoral recipients who received bonuses in addition to salary. Table 5 presents a summary of the geographic distribution of the doctoral-level survey respondents. Table 6 summarizes the major professional society memberships of the respondents. Many respondents belong to more than one society.
Table 7 summarizes, according to the National Research Council (NRC), the numbers of individuals who have received their doctorates in toxicology since 1983 (the first year that the degree was included in the NRC annual summary) (National Research Council, 1999). Also included is a summary of the number of doctoral respondents by years post-degree.
Table 8 provides a summary analysis of the influence of geographic location of place of employment on salaries for doctoral-level employees. Table 9 provides a summary of the influence of certification (either American Board of Toxicology or Academy of Toxicologic Sciences) on doctoral and master's-level salaries.

Discussion and Conclusions

The 2001 survey results point to a number of different trends that deserve attention. First, although the situation has clearly improved for most entry-level and early-career positions, women continue to be compensated at a lower level than their male counterparts. Secondly, salaries as a whole have increased in the field, but the most impressive differences are not by geographic location of place of employment, but rather by type of employer. Finally, certification continues to play a significant positive role in compensation.
It is interesting that the results for toxicologists in the 2001 AAPS salary survey (which appeared just as this article was finalized—AAPS 2001) are consistent with the results reported here.

References

AAPS (2001) Salary and Employment Status Survey, AAPS Newsmagazine, December, 2001.
Gad SC. (1989) First international salary survey for toxicologist. J Am Coll Toxicol 8:1053-70.
Gad SC. (1992) 1991 Toxicology salary survey results. J Am Coll Toxicol 11:369-78.
Gad SC. (1996) Third Triennial Toxicology Salary Survey. J Am Coll Toxicol 15:83-89.
Gad SC. (1999) Fourth Triennial toxicology Salary Survey. Inter. Journal of Toxicol 18:219-224.
National Research Council. (1999) Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities Summary Report. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB. (1983) Handbook of Survey Research. New York, NY: Academic Press.

 


SOT is dedicated to creating a safer and healthier world by advancing the science of toxicology.

© 2010 Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy and Disclaimer | Contact Us